Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Anti-Money Laundering Compliance for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses: A Risk-Based Governance Framework

Authors

  • S. M. Sadek Ismail St. John’s University Law School Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67487/ijfmg.v1i1.289

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, anti-money laundering, compliance, small and medium-sized enterprises, governance, financial crime

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly presented as a solution to persistent weaknesses in anti-money-laundering (AML) compliance, including high false-positive rates, fragmented customer data, delayed investigations, and limited compliance capacity. Yet most discussions focus on banks and large financial institutions, leaving small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), fintech firms, money-service businesses, professional service providers, and other regulated or exposed enterprises without a proportionate implementation model. This conceptual article examines how AI can support business-facing AML functions while preserving legal accountability, explainability, privacy, and human judgment. The article identifies five high-value use cases: customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, adverse-media screening, network analysis, and investigation support. It does this by using international AML standards, regulatory guidance, AI-risk governance frameworks, and recent financial-crime technology literature. It also evaluates major risks, including biased data, opaque models, automation bias, model drift, cyber manipulation, privacy violations, and the use of generative AI by criminals. The article proposes the Responsible AI-AML Governance Framework, organized around six pillars: risk scoping, data governance, model validation, human oversight, documentation and auditability, and continuous monitoring. The framework is designed as a proportionate roadmap for businesses with limited resources. The article concludes that AI should augment, rather than replace, accountable compliance professionals and that effective adoption depends more on governance quality than algorithmic sophistication.

Author Biography

  • S. M. Sadek Ismail, St. John’s University Law School

    St. John's Law School

References

References

Bank for International Settlements. (2023). Project Aurora: The power of data, technology and collaboration to combat money laundering across institutions and borders. BIS Innovation Hub.

Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4-17.

Desai, A., Kosse, A., & Sharples, J. (2024). Finding a needle in a haystack: A machine learning framework for anomaly detection in payment systems (BIS Working Papers No. 1188). Bank for International Settlements.

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.

Financial Action Task Force. (2020). Guidance on digital identity. Paris: FATF.

Financial Action Task Force. (2021a). Opportunities and challenges of new technologies for AML/CFT. Paris: FATF.

Financial Action Task Force. (2021b). Stocktake on data pooling, collaborative analytics and data protection. Paris: FATF.

Financial Action Task Force. (2025). Horizon scan: Artificial intelligence and deepfakes—Impacts on money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing. Paris: FATF.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (2018). Joint statement on innovative efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (2024). FinCEN alert on fraud schemes involving deepfake media targeting financial institutions (FIN-2024-Alert004). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Financial Stability Institute. (2019). Suptech applications for anti-money laundering (FSI Insights No. 18). Bank for International Settlements.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, & National Credit Union Administration. (2018). Joint statement on innovative efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on artificial intelligence. Paris: OECD.

Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3-38.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Estimating illicit financial flows resulting from drug trafficking and other transnational organized crimes (Research Report). Vienna: UNODC.

Wolfsberg Group. (2022). Principles for using artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial crime risk management.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31