Realism and International Security: A Study of the Logic of Competition and Cooperation in Inter-State Relations

Authors

  • Peter Sunday Equere Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria Author
  • Iniobong Edward Ekong University of Uyo, Nigeria Author
  • Victor Columba Daniel University of Lagos, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67487/ijprss.v2i2.290

Keywords:

Realist Theory, International Security, Structural Realism, State Survival

Abstract

This paper is a discourse on key features of the realist theory as one of the approaches to the study of international security. Realism places much emphasis on the currency of power, taking into due cognisance the nature and structure of the international system. This paper explores the major variants within the world of realism and their relevance to state security policies. Such a variant includes structural realism, which addresses the impact of the international system in the perspective of the behavioral pattern of states, and motivational realism, which stresses the impact of variation on the motives of states. Furthermore, the paper interrogates the arguments between the structural, offensive, and defensive realists concerning the nature of the international system in generating or adopting competitive and cooperative policies. The paper, using the analytical method of historical writing and relying mainly on secondary sources, argues that realism is a widely accepted and dominant theory of international politics. That it is largely on the basis of how realists depict the international environment that they assert the view that states are the major actors in the international system. That the first priority for states is to ensure their survival and the most important and indispensable means of survival is self-help. In this light, the paper concludes that realism subscribes to the three Ss: statism, survival, and self-help. Statism, being the centerpiece of realism; survival, the primary objective of the state; and self-help, the most important means of survival.

Keywords: , , , , x.

Author Biographies

  • Peter Sunday Equere, Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria

    Department of History and Diplomatic Studies 

  • Iniobong Edward Ekong, University of Uyo, Nigeria

    Department of History and International Studies

  • Victor Columba Daniel, University of Lagos, Nigeria

    Department of History and Strategic Studies 

References

Baylis, John, and Steve Smith. 2001. The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Copeland, Dale C. 2000. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Glaser, Charles L. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jarvis, Robert. 1978. "Cooperation under the Security Dilemma." World Politics 30 (1): 167–214.

Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.

Smith, Joseph V. 1986. Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Snyder, Jack L. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Van Evera, Stephen. 1999. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

Most read articles by the same author(s)