Source-of-Funds Verification Gaps in U.S. Investor Immigration: An AML Risk-Based Framework for Immigration Practitioners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67487/gjmret.v2i5.284Keywords:
source-of-funds, anti-money laundering, investor immigration, EB-5, risk-based approach, customer due diligence, immigration compliance, financial-crime riskAbstract
United States investor-based immigration categories require petitioners to establish the lawful source of invested capital, yet the intake and documentation-review practices used by immigration practitioners have developed largely independently of the risk-based due diligence methodologies that govern anti-money laundering (AML) compliance in banking and financial services. This paper examines that divergence and argues that it constitutes a structural, remediable gap with consequences for adjudicative efficiency, program integrity, and the financial-crime risk exposure of investment-based immigration categories. Drawing on the risk-based approach articulated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the customer due diligence (CDD) principles codified by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), this paper develops a four-component framework: risk-tiered intake classification, a structured documentation-review protocol, escalation and red-flag procedures, and a training and institutionalization component, and it is intended for direct adoption by immigration practices handling cross-border investment records. The framework's rationale is grounded in documented enforcement history, illustrated through a representative hypothetical application, and situated within the broader trajectory of US beneficial-ownership and financial-transparency policy. The paper closes with the author's recommendations for practices, professional associations, and future research.
References
Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-508, 84 Stat. 1114 (Oct. 26, 1970), codified as amended in scattered sections of 12 U.S.C. and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5311–5332.
Benson, Katie. "From Money Laundering to Illicit Finance? The Evolving 'AML' Regulatory Regimes for Legal Professionals in the UK and Australia." Current Issues in Criminal Justice 37, no. 2 (2025): 245–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2443702
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Pub. L. No. 117-103, Div. BB (EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022), 136 Stat. 1070 (Mar. 15, 2022), codified in relevant part at 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(5).
Corporate Transparency Act, William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-283, Div. F, §§ 6401–6403, 134 Stat. 3388 (Jan. 1, 2021), codified at 31 U.S.C. § 5336.
Financial Action Task Force. International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation: The FATF Recommendations, in particular Recommendation 1 (the risk-based approach) and Recommendations 22–23 (customer due diligence and record-keeping obligations for designated non-financial businesses and professions) (Feb. 2012, as subsequently amended).
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions, 81 Fed. Reg. 29,398 (May 11, 2016) (codified at 31 C.F.R. § 1010.230).
Lankhorst, Francien, and Hans Nelen. "Professional Services and Organised Crime in The Netherlands." Crime, Law and Social Change 42 (2004): 163–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-005-5656-1
Levi, Michael. "Lawyers as Money Laundering Enablers? An Evolving and Contentious Relationship." Global Crime 23, no. 2 (2022): 126–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2022.2089122
Pol, Ronald F. "Anti-Money Laundering Effectiveness: Assessing Outcomes or Ticking Boxes?" Journal of Money Laundering Control 21, no. 2 (2018): 215–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2017-0029
Pol, Ronald F. "Anti-Money Laundering: The World's Least Effective Policy Experiment? Together, We Can Fix It." Policy Design and Practice (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1725366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1725366
Reiser, James. "A Dive Into EB-5: A Need for Complete Modernization of U.S. Investor-Based Immigration Program (EB-5, Employment-Based Immigration: Fifth Preference)." Touro Law Review 35, no. 4 (2020).
Surak, Kristin. "Marketizing Sovereign Prerogatives: How to Sell Citizenship." Archives Européennes de Sociologie 62, no. 2 (2021): 275–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975621000217
Surak, Kristin. "Millionaire Mobility and the Sale of Citizenship." Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1758554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1758554
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part G — Investors, Chapter 2 ("Eligibility Requirements"), Section A.4 ("Lawful Source of Funds"). https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-g-chapter-2 (last retrieved August 6, 2026).
U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Vermont. Press Release: Ariel Quiros Pleads Guilty to Fraud Charges Related to the Jay Peak EB-5 AnC Vermont Project in Northeast Vermont (Aug. 14, 2020). https://www.justice.gov/usao-vt/pr/ariel-quiros-pleads-guilty-fraud-charges-related-jay-peak-eb-5-anc-vermont-project (last retrieved August 6, 2026).
U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Vermont. Press Release: Four Men Indicted on Fraud Charges Related to the Jay Peak EB-5 AnC Vermont Project in Northeast Vermont (May 22, 2019). https://www.justice.gov/usao-vt/pr/four-men-indicted-fraud-charges-related-jay-peak-eb-5-anc-vermont-project-northeast (last retrieved August 6, 2026).
U.S. Government Accountability Office. Immigrant Investor Program: Opportunities Exist to Improve Fraud and National Security Risk Monitoring, GAO-23-106452 (2023).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
