Budget Incrementalism and Federal Character in Rural Project Allocation in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria: A Case Study, 2008–2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67487/gjmret.v2i5.330Keywords:
budgetary incrementalism, rural development, public budgeting, spatial allocation, budget implementation, Akwa Ibom State, NigeriaAbstract
This study examined budgetary incrementalism and rural development in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, between 2008 and 2017, with particular attention to the federal-character distribution of rural-development projects in Mkpat Enin, Itu and Etim Ekpo Local Government Areas. The study adopted a comparative case-study design, combining documentary analysis of budget and project records with field observation of selected rural infrastructure. Budgetary trends were analysed using annual changes and percentage variations, while project frequency and financial allocations were used to examine the federal-character distribution. The findings show that the state's aggregate budget increased from ₦162.48 billion in 2008 to ₦371.00 billion in 2017, indicating substantial and persistent budgetary expansion, although annual growth rates varied. The distribution of rural-development projects was also uneven across the study areas. Itu recorded the highest number of documented projects, whereas Etim Ekpo recorded the highest combined financial value among the three areas. Field observations further indicated continuing deficiencies in selected roads, health facilities and schools despite documented budgetary provisions. The findings provide qualified support for an incrementalist pattern in the state's budgeting process but do not establish incrementalism as the sole determinant of allocation decisions. The study concludes that increasing budgetary allocations does not necessarily translate into proportionate rural-development outcomes and recommends needs-based allocation, clearer classification of projects by funding jurisdiction, stronger project-level monitoring, and improved tracking of budget execution from appropriation to completion.
References
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
ConstitutionNet. (2024, July 25). Nigeria’s Supreme Court protects autonomy of local governments in accordance with constitutional federalism. International IDEA. https://constitutionnet.org/news/nigerias-supreme-court-protects-autonomy-local-governments-accordance-constitutional
Dlakwa, H. D. (2004). The politics of intergovernmental relations in Nigeria: Perspectives of the North-East geo-political zone. In F. Egwaikhide et al. (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations in Nigeria. John Archers.
Egbide, B.-C., Madugba, J. U., Otekunrin, A., Adenike, O., & Oludare, F. (2022). Responsiveness of rural development to budget management attributes: Evidence from Ogun State, Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.01
Egobueze, A., & Ojirika, C. U. (2018). Corruption and fiscal federalism in Nigeria: Analysis of the federal budgetary process, 1999–2016. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(10), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2018.1113
Good, D. A. (2011). Still budgeting by muddling through: Why disjointed incrementalism lasts. Policy and Society, 30(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.005
Howlett, M., & Migone, A. (2011). Charles Lindblom is alive and well and living in punctuated equilibrium land. Policy and Society, 30(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.006
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
Okafor, J. (2010). Local government financial autonomy in Nigeria: The State Joint Local Government Account. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, (6), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i6.1621
Okereke, O. G., Ekpe, A. N., & Udoh, U. S. (2026). Public financial management and budget evaluation as a political instrument in Nigeria. International Journal of Culture and Society, 7(1), 49–57.
PEFA Secretariat. (2020). PEFA framework for assessing public financial management. World Bank. https://www.pefa.org/sites/pefa/files/news/files/PEFA-Framework_English.pdf
Rafindadi, A. A., & Kondo, K. A. (2018). Public finance and rural development in Nigeria: Empirical evidence from the structural equation modeling. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(11), 1313–1339. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.811.1313.1339
Raji, A. A. (2024). Revenue allocation formula: Appraisal of fundamental issues in Nigeria’s fiscal federalism and political stability. International Journal of Intellectual Discourse, 7(1), 1–16.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
The Guardian (Nigeria). (2026, January 8). Supreme Court verdict: 19 months after, govs explore gaps in constitution, resist LG autonomy. https://guardian.ng/news/supreme-court-verdict19-months-after-govs-explore-gaps-in-constitution-resist-lg-autonomy/
The Sun (Nigeria). (August 10, 2026). Silence, contradictions trail LG autonomy across South-South states. https://thesun.ng/silence-contradictions-trail-lg-autonomy-across-south-south-states/
Udoh, U. A. S. (2019). Public financial management and rural development in Akwa Ibom State between 2008 and 2017 [Doctoral dissertation, Abia State University, Uturu].
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Little, Brown.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.